Concerning the statistical test results, we find that the Philippines outperforms our most similar neighbor, Vietnam, by having both a higher GDP and lower CO₂ emissions from cement and fossil fuels. In contrast, our most different neighbor, Myanmar, has both a lower GDP and lower emissions, making direct comparison challenging.

Our permutation regression test shows statistically significant relationships between the Philippines' GDP and its CO₂ emissions from both cement and fossil fuels.

Notably, the regression coefficient for the Philippines' fossil fuel CO₂ emissions in relation to GDP is significantly different from those of other developing countries. However, the regression coefficient for cement CO₂ emissions is not significantly different. Furthermore, the Philippines' regression coefficient for fossil fuel CO₂ emissions (y) versus GDP (x) is the third lowest among the countries studied, even lower than that of the developed United States, with only Sri Lanka and Myanmar having lower coefficients.

In our analysis, a lower coefficient communicates that a region is doing comparatively better, as it signifies a lower CO₂ emissions increase per GDP increase.

The data on CO₂ emissions over GDP for the Philippines show a general decrease over time, suggesting improvements in carbon efficiency over time. Several factors could have contributed to this trend. Technological advancements in energy efficiency and the adoption of cleaner technologies likely played a role. Environmental policies, such as the Renewable Energy Act of 2008, which provides incentives for renewable energy investments, could also have been influential in promoting cleaner energy and reducing reliance on fossil fuels​. The Philippines' service-oriented economy might also contribute to lower emissions compared to industrial-heavy neighbors like Vietnam​

This isn't all good news, however. While the Philippines may be doing comparatively better considering its rapid economic growth and with respect to its neighbors, our data visualization still shows the overall, our country's carbon footprint is still increasing. Striking while the iron is hot and addressing these issues before they become more set in stone and follow the trends of our more developed priors is imperative, so that we may still have a place on Earth to grow.

And broader challenges still remain, despite our relatively better carbon efficiency, CO₂ emissions will still rise with economic growth, and are not the only sources of environmental degredation. Comprehensive environmental policies addressing issues such as pollution, deforestation, and biodiversity loss are crucial.

Moreover, GDP growth, even in our dataset, which is adjusted to cost-of-living by its nature in International Dollars, does not fully capture the well-being of an entire population. Issues like poverty, wealth inequality, and access to essential services remain significant challenges in teh Phillipines. And while our GDP growth indicates economic activity and potential for a better future, it does not necessasrily equate to improved living standards. Addressing social issues alongside economic ones is vital in creating a healthier and more sustainable society.

To expand on this project, comparing CO₂ emission data with nomial GDP in USD would provide a different and more comprehensive perspective, especially when combined with the basket-of-goods adjusted data of International Dollars or PPP.

Additionally, analyzing CO2 emissions over GDP in different economic sectors, such as agriculture, manufacturing, and services, could identify which areas of domestic production are most carbon efficient and which need more targeted or specialized policies and action.

The incorporation of other environmental indicators as well, such as water usage, air quality, pollution, and deforestation would offer a more well-rounded view of a country's environmental impact, as well as including socioeconomic factors in the analysis, such as poverty rates, education levels, and wealth distribution would highlight the interplay between economic growth, environmental impact, and population health.

Lastly, a more qualitative analysis on how significant policies and events in each countries could provide insights into how events and intervention affect a region's environmental impact. Taking a look at how industrial reforms and energy acts could reveal how important interventions actually are.

Overall, by incorporating these elements in a future study, the investigation could provide a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the relationship between Carbon emissions, economic growth, and sustainability.